New locations\streets most definetly

Murphy's been a bad boy ...

Moderator: Moderators

Change or Return to the old?

I want the old-school Silent Hill town back.
33
58%
I like change and want to see something completely different
24
42%
 
Total votes: 57

User avatar
Emzo
Cafe5to2 Waitress
Posts: 200
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Location: Jack's Inn, trying to use the free wifi

Post by Emzo »

I like the original street plans; keeps the creepiness from the older games.
Nothing wrong with a bit more decay to show the passage of time (destroyed buildings that can provide more routes, etc)

That was the creepiest parts of 2 and 3 for me; the same locations.
~| I've Come to Change the Order |~
User avatar
Ghost
Just Passing Through
Posts: 65
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Gender: Male
Location: Selecta

Post by Ghost »

I liked a lot when
PRIME_BBCODE_SPOILER_SHOW PRIME_BBCODE_SPOILER:
I followed James' steps with Heather
Some of those are really cool, but going through the exact same dungeon can be tiring and desnecessary. I vote for new places inside Silent Hill and why not some reference to Shepherd's Glen or Ashfield.
User avatar
Ben Trovato
Just Passing Through
Posts: 77
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Location: Silent... What?

Post by Ben Trovato »

I'm all for a mixbag.

Not half and half, but sort of like SH3.
More than Homecoming though.
"This Whole Thing Is Turning Into A Freakin' Mess!"
Mephisto
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 8073
Joined: 12 Feb 2009

Post by Mephisto »

^What do you mean by more like SH3? Straight linear path? C'mon, in this game we didn't had anytime to explore the SH town. It was all: car, a few streets, hospital, a few streets. At least in the other games - like 1 and 2 - we had plenty of places to go. When I say plenty of places I'm talking about the streets. Just take a look at the SH map for the first 2 games and then look at the map for the 3rd one. Too small.
User avatar
Xev
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 1881
Joined: 01 May 2006
Gender: Female
Location: in the branches that blow

Post by Xev »

As a few folks have said, I would love the old Silent Hill streets with a new area like jumping on the subway to Ashfield's streets *not building world though*

I also agree with Ghost in that its kinda cool to run around and see the same things with different characters. Maybe its the nature bug in me but it would be cool to run through a forest world type atmosphere by T lake.
Image
User avatar
UndeadFishtank
Just Passing Through
Posts: 106
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Location: Flatpoint High
Contact:

Post by UndeadFishtank »

Xev wrote:As a few folks have said, I would love the old Silent Hill streets with a new area like jumping on the subway to Ashfield's streets *not building world though*

I also agree with Ghost in that its kinda cool to run around and see the same things with different characters. Maybe its the nature bug in me but it would be cool to run through a forest world type atmosphere by T lake.
After Alan Wake, I'd like anything but running in a forest world near any lake. That's all you do in that game! I have no doubt that Vatra could do it better, but still, comparisons, comparisons.
"I stole the TV.” ~ Jerri Blank, 1999
User avatar
Ben Trovato
Just Passing Through
Posts: 77
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Location: Silent... What?

Post by Ben Trovato »

Mephisto wrote:^What do you mean by more like SH3? Straight linear path? C'mon, in this game we didn't had anytime to explore the SH town. It was all: car, a few streets, hospital, a few streets. At least in the other games - like 1 and 2 - we had plenty of places to go. When I say plenty of places I'm talking about the streets. Just take a look at the SH map for the first 2 games and then look at the map for the 3rd one. Too small.

I only meant that SH3 used some of the same locations/streets as SH2, simply.

Personally I don't want to spend countless hours exploring those (already known) locations... just to see them for a short while would be enough for me.
Going through an old SH1 or SH2 street once again but onto a new place.
A quick stroll onto Rosewater Park, or onto Bradbury/Bachman Rd. onto the Amusement Park... I dunno.

For the rest I'd be satisfied with whole new environments.

I don't feel the urge to actually explore those old streets thoroughly... maybe halfway between this and a glimpse or a "cameo"... but it would be nice to see them again for a while...
"This Whole Thing Is Turning Into A Freakin' Mess!"
User avatar
UndeadFishtank
Just Passing Through
Posts: 106
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Location: Flatpoint High
Contact:

Post by UndeadFishtank »

Ben Trovato wrote:
Mephisto wrote:^What do you mean by more like SH3? Straight linear path? C'mon, in this game we didn't had anytime to explore the SH town. It was all: car, a few streets, hospital, a few streets. At least in the other games - like 1 and 2 - we had plenty of places to go. When I say plenty of places I'm talking about the streets. Just take a look at the SH map for the first 2 games and then look at the map for the 3rd one. Too small.

I only meant that SH3 used some of the same locations/streets as SH2, simply.

Personally I don't want to spend countless hours exploring those (already known) locations... just to see them for a short while would be enough for me.
Going through an old SH1 or SH2 street once again but onto a new place.
A quick stroll onto Rosewater Park, or onto Bradbury/Bachman Rd. onto the Amusement Park... I dunno.

For the rest I'd be satisfied with whole new environments.

I don't feel the urge to actually explore those old streets thoroughly... maybe halfway between this and a glimpse or a "cameo"... but it would be nice to see them again for a while...
Although the game is called Silent Hill, so keeping it in Silent Hill would be a good idea also. Although I know what you mean, and I agree. Old streets appearing briefly would be great, but not in the same way Homecoming did it, hopefully. :)
"I stole the TV.” ~ Jerri Blank, 1999
User avatar
greenrizz
Just Passing Through
Posts: 58
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Location: Lakeside amusment park

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by greenrizz »

I would love a return to the old streets of silent hill, perhaps with an exploration more west of south vale? Surely a mix of new and old would be better than something completely new, i don't like the idea of the "this game is from a different universe from the old games" sort of approach, and how can it be unless it explores some old ground?
Thats what she said...
User avatar
Skele
Subway Guard
Posts: 1558
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Location: VA

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Skele »

i just want exploration back period. that was one of the things i didn't like about Homecoming. sure, we got to explore and all, but there wasn't a whole lot of town to explore. i want more houses, stores, alleys, and streets to explore.
User avatar
UndeadFishtank
Just Passing Through
Posts: 106
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Location: Flatpoint High
Contact:

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by UndeadFishtank »

Skele wrote:i just want exploration back period. that was one of the things i didn't like about Homecoming. sure, we got to explore and all, but there wasn't a whole lot of town to explore. i want more houses, stores, alleys, and streets to explore.
Yeah, and it would be nice if not every door was locked. Past Silent Hill games had it so you could go in some buildings/rooms, even if they weren't necessary. It lengthens the gameplay time, and it's just cool. Then the game path isn't so linear. Exploration Back +1
"I stole the TV.” ~ Jerri Blank, 1999
User avatar
Kenji
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 5077
Joined: 19 Jul 2007

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Kenji »

Skele wrote:i just want exploration back period. that was one of the things i didn't like about Homecoming. sure, we got to explore and all, but there wasn't a whole lot of town to explore. i want more houses, stores, alleys, and streets to explore.
Speaking of Homecoming, I particularly remember a fire escape ladder in the alley near the abandoned truck you siphon gas from. You can climb up it, and then climb down. It reminded me of the exploration we could've had.
Image
User avatar
UndeadFishtank
Just Passing Through
Posts: 106
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Location: Flatpoint High
Contact:

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by UndeadFishtank »

Kenji wrote:
Skele wrote:i just want exploration back period. that was one of the things i didn't like about Homecoming. sure, we got to explore and all, but there wasn't a whole lot of town to explore. i want more houses, stores, alleys, and streets to explore.
Speaking of Homecoming, I particularly remember a fire escape ladder in the alley near the abandoned truck you siphon gas from. You can climb up it, and then climb down. It reminded me of the exploration we could've had.
Are you saying that we shouldn't have exploration? Because that post sounded overtly sarcastic. And I never really did understand the fire escape ladder. The way the rest of the game was laid out made it seem like a feature (something extra at the top) that they were going to include and then didn't. Hm.
"I stole the TV.” ~ Jerri Blank, 1999
User avatar
Kenji
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 5077
Joined: 19 Jul 2007

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Kenji »

Pretty much that: It was probably going to lead somewhere, but was forgotten amid the rush to go gold... or, was left in because it would've taken more work to remove and didn't interfere with anything. However, it sticks out like a sore thumb and I remember, when I first found it, thinking that maybe this would play into alternate entry routes or new ways of approaching ye olde Zelda-esque building-dungeon gameplay. Never happened, unfortunately.

It sticks out all the sorer for how linear the rest of the game is, in regards to pathways.

Oh, and for the record, I dig exploration... as long as there are interesting things to see.
Image
User avatar
UndeadFishtank
Just Passing Through
Posts: 106
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Location: Flatpoint High
Contact:

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by UndeadFishtank »

Kenji wrote:Pretty much that: It was probably going to lead somewhere, but was forgotten amid the rush to go gold... or, was left in because it would've taken more work to remove and didn't interfere with anything. However, it sticks out like a sore thumb and I remember, when I first found it, thinking that maybe this would play into alternate entry routes or new ways of approaching ye olde Zelda-esque building-dungeon gameplay. Never happened, unfortunately.

It sticks out all the sorer for how linear the rest of the game is, in regards to pathways.

Oh, and for the record, I dig exploration... as long as there are interesting things to see.
And not like pathways that lead to nothing in particular. Or feel unfinished/make the game feel unfinished. I get what you're saying. Yeah, I think it should be more of a challenge to figure out where exactly you are supposed to go on the new Silent Hill game, like in Silent Hill 2. I had a friend play it and it took him forever to figure out he was supposed to go down the alleyway. He went to the trailer first. :lol: Silent Hill 1 I'm sure is the same way, although I've never fully played through it. Homecoming not only had a very linear (and repetitive) path, but pointless "objectives" telling you where exactly to go! (As if you couldn't figure it out simply enough.) Pathways/Alternate Routes +1 (Like Shattered Memories, or...? :))
"I stole the TV.” ~ Jerri Blank, 1999
User avatar
Kenji
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 5077
Joined: 19 Jul 2007

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Kenji »

I can agree with all of that, but I'd like to take it a bit farther.

The Zelda overworld-and-dungeon structure (like boss battles) really gives Silent Hill a game-y feeling, because it's separated from reality. A boss battle is inherently less frightening (with the exception of the very well-designed Scarlet) because of the nature of boss battles: Bosses are roadblocks to advancement, and therefore must be destroyed. That they must be destroyed means they can be destroyed, which means all of your thinking becomes pooled to figuring out how to destroy it instead of second-guessing whether you should fight or flee.

Likewise, the potential dread of entering a dark and enclosed space is mitigated by knowing you must do it, because you can't advance until you've done it (dungeons are roadblocks to advancement). In theory, wouldn't a hospital be all the more frightening if you didn't feel that you absolutely had to go inside, but that it might still be worth your while? Somehow, the fact you must go inside must be hidden enough to make it seem like a choice you must make, that you could live the rest of your life without ever doing it.

I don't know, but I think it requires a complete reevaluation of Silent Hill as a game structure, to get at these possibilities. Also, multiple entry points, even from such things as windows or fire escapes, could increase exploration opportunities and decrease the sense that every building the protagonist enters is a dungeon with its map, new weapon, boss, and quest item needed to proceed.
Image
User avatar
Skele
Subway Guard
Posts: 1558
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Location: VA

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Skele »

haha i remember going up the fire escape ladder, thinking it was going to lead to something cool... but it didn't. i got up there and thought "that's it?" it was also disappointing how few locations there were to actually explore. i remember coming across the sign for the Bartlett vineyard, but sadly you couldn't get to it.

it also would've been real nice to see, and explore the houses of the other founding families.
AgentX7k
Hope House Careworker
Posts: 731
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Location: Australia

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by AgentX7k »

I think they've done a good job at milking the same town so far, but I'd like much more exploration of SH than Homecoming offered. But then you have to consider the problem - If they keep adding, eventually Silent Hill will be classified as a city.

Basically I'd like a mix of new + old. I mean what about Old Silent Hill? That's a gold mine, we haven't seen it since SH1, which took place in the 80's, so between SH1 and 8 we've got 20 years of history and 2 generations of console, so nice trip down memory lane, chance for alot of new places/buildings (that could have realistically been built in the last 20 years) and nicer visuals.

We could also go back to South Silent Hill, SH3 was the last time we saw that and it was along time ago, plus the Resort Area (same deal as Old SH). Just no more Central, that's done to death.

And I agree about Nathan Avenue, we've never seen that. There's also the forest, a farm (start of SH2), the coal mine. Lakeside Amusement park during fog world would be nice. We could go into another mansion or some residential houses. Could SH also have a train station?
"The Body Is Cold?"
User avatar
Kenji
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 5077
Joined: 19 Jul 2007

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Kenji »

Skele wrote:it also would've been real nice to see, and explore the houses of the other founding families.
Oh, most definitely. I don't want to turn this into a "how would you improve Homecoming" discussion, but that story would have done nothing but benefited from the further inclusion of the four family heads. Adam Shepherd and his thoughts on duty and loyalty are infinitely more interesting and original (with respect to the series) than where his son ended up going.
Image
User avatar
Sam Pilgrim
Just Passing Through
Posts: 146
Joined: 05 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Location: Space Sector 2814

Re: New locations\streets most definetly

Post by Sam Pilgrim »

I'm all for yes.
Damn, those streets look good and creepy, it'll be interesting.
Image
The secret of fifty-two is that the multiverse still exists
Post Reply