Angela

Post by **emptimass** » 10 Jun 2006

^ Thomas kind of has the right to though. He is kind of like
the SH2 expert here.(Not to brown nose or anything but it is true)
I am sure Thomas does not know everything about SH2.....well
then again..........nah. Pretty fucking close though. The man has
CSI-ed the fuck out of the game and has probably the most accurate
info you will find on the subject.

He also seems to have a pretty photographic memory which
most people do not. He can play once and pick these things up.
Maybe just a little impatient with those not gifted with this ability
but honestly, why get hurt over what somebody that you have never
met and probably never will types to you on a forum? Whoops did I
say "a forum"? I meant "The Forum".

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » 10 Jun 2006

emptimass: who wouldn't be somewhat an expert after 4, 5 years?

no one has the right to be disrespectful, no matter how stupid or smart one is.
well i pm'ed you ^^

all i know about angela is that she was abused by her father, and that she is in silent hill looking for her mother (for what purpose? who knows...)
other then that i guess it's speculations and theories.

Post by **SilentSteven** » 10 Jun 2006

Okay I know we are getting off topic here but I totally agree with ZigZag and Maq that St Thomas is making himself look very ignorant and being rude to people.

Even if you have a large knowledge about something if you continunally run your mouth and put other people down all you ever do is make yourself look a bit of a prat. I know St Thomas is a long time member and has some very good ideas (a number of which I agree with) but that doesn't make him a total authority on the subject of Silent Hill able to dictate what is right and wrong. As soon as Konami released the games they became each gamers own experience. Each person will feel and experience something different - then hopefully come on here to talk about those experiences. He is discounting peoples experiences opinions simply because they don't agree with his own.

Even though the internet is pretty anonymous I have always thought you should treat people and their views with the same amount of respect as if they were stood right next to you. Maybe everyone could just think about what their saying before opening their mouths.

See now you all made me rant! Now can someone please help me off my high horse now.........!

Silent Ste

Post by **The Adversary** » 10 Jun 2006

I never treated anyone poorly. Please get over the idea that a person is the same as their ideas. They're not. Anyone whose played the game & read the article concerning Thomas Orosco's death should be able to determine that there wasn't a fire. Like I said before: wallets & bodies burn.

This has nothing to do with time spent on a forum--I don't care if you've been here two years or two weeks: If someone believes in something that is inherently wrong, I'm going to tell you, and it's going to be very blunt. I'm not discounting peoples opinions because they differ from mine, but because they contradict what the games specifically state.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » 10 Jun 2006

St. Thomas wrote:I never treated anyone poorly. Please get over the idea that a person is the same as their ideas. They're not.

thats what you think.

i can't see anyone with such idea. and it's not only about this topic either...
and they're not always inherently wrong.

just not logical to all. and not all you say either is logical to all... so if it doesn't make sense to you, it doesn't mean it's wrong. as you said earlier in this thread, something about "took them years to get that mary never left brookheavan" doesn't mean it was wrong.

Post by **The Adversary** » 10 Jun 2006

>thats what you think.
Okay. If you really believe that you are an idea, then that's the dumbest idea I've heard. I am not my ideas; you are not yours. People are separate from their ideas, and they are not interchangeable. If you continue believing this, then of course you're going to take offense--because the idea is wrong: Angela never set her house on fire because, for the nth time, wallets & bodies burn.

If you really want to continue this topic, please use the Search button. People have erroneously been equating ideas as the individual who presents them for years--and they're still wrong.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » 10 Jun 2006

>Okay. If you really believe that you are an idea, then that's the dumbest idea I've heard. I am not my ideas; you are not yours. People are separate from their ideas, and they are not interchangeable. If you continue believing this, then of course you're going to take offense--because the idea is wrong

what the heck are you talking about?

>Angela never set her house on fire because, for the nth time, wallets & bodies burn.

i've got that...

>If you really want to continue this topic, please use the Search button. People have erroneously been equating ideas as the individual who presents them for years--and they're still wrong.
i use the search button, i've read alot of theories. but they are THEORIES!

Post by **LizLadyNinja** » 10 Jun 2006

Back to Angela yes? So she didn't set the house on fire, okay. And maybe she killed her brother maybe not. Maybe he just died. I'm begining to think this thread is turning into a bashing fest!

Post by **amphreded** » 10 Jun 2006

If Angela did kill her own brother, it should also be in the newspaper. But then again, there's no solid evidence that her brother was killed after the news on her dad's murder had been posted.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » 10 Jun 2006

but why is she saying that her mother is all thats left?
could she just be asuming that he's dead? and then, could it be possible she tried to kill him but failed without knowing?

Post by **LizLadyNinja** » 10 Jun 2006

amphreded wrote:If Angela did kill her own brother, it should also be in the newspaper. But then again, there's no solid evidence that her brother was killed after the news on her dad's murder had been posted.

Thats what I thought. And thats why I asked about it. Cause if he is dead then why was it not in the paper?

So there is no solid evidence that he is dead... only and assumption!

Post by **Hell_is_Silent** » 11 Jun 2006

LizLadyNinja wrote:
amphreded wrote:If Angela did kill her own brother, it should also be in the newspaper. But then again, there's no solid evidence that her brother was killed after the news on her dad's murder had been posted.
Thats what I thought. And thats why I asked about it. Cause if he is dead then why was it not in the paper? So there is no solid evidence that he is dead... only and assumption!

There is no solid evidence, but there are clues. As with most things in Silent Hill.

Post by **Spirit** » 12 Jun 2006

But, you know, maybe her brother died before the papers could print it, or maybe before anyone discovered it. A number of things could have happened with her brother, there's no right or wrong answer here.

About the whole fire-stairs thing... I'm just taking a swing in the dark, but maybe the fires don't exist in Angela's world...? I mean, Angela doesn't see some of James' monsters, same with Eddie and Laura. Perhaps James sees and feels the fire, but it's just another illusion. After all, Angela created her own world in Silent Hill, just like James did... Maybe she saw something else, and not the flames.... Meh o_o; I assume what Krist said, that after that stairs thing, she just wanders for answers, but never finds any.

Hmm.. I think a while back I read a topic about pictures in the fire stairs, which you could only see with a camera hack. I don't remember what they were... Does anyone?

Post by **Dr. Gordon** » 12 Jun 2006

Spirit wrote:But, you know, maybe her brother died before the papers could print it, or maybe before anyone discovered it. A number of things could have happened with her brother, there's no right or wrong answer here.

About the whole fire-stairs thing... I'm just taking a swing in the dark, but maybe the fires don't exist in Angela's world...? I mean, Angela doesn't see some of James' monsters, same with Eddie and Laura. Perhaps James sees and feels the fire, but it's just another illusion. After all, Angela created her own world in Silent Hill, just like James did... Maybe she saw something else, and not the flames.... Meh o_o; I assume what Krist said, that after that stairs thing, she just wanders for answers, but never finds any.

Hmm.. I think a while back I read a topic about pictures in the fire stairs, which you could only see with a camera hack. I don't remember what they were... Does anyone?

Here's a video with the stairs hack. It's about half way down.
http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.ph ... highlight=

Post by **Spirit** » 12 Jun 2006

Yeah, I remember seeing that, she reached the top and does some Yoga. Anyone know what that's about, either?

EDIT: Oh, no no, wait. Fuck that theory I just set up one post earlier. Remembered what happened at that scene, never mind!

Post by **ZigZag** » 12 Jun 2006

Spirit wrote:Yeah, I remember seeing that, she reached the top and does some Yoga. Anyone know what that's about, either?

I'm pretty sure it's just something to do with developing the game and shouldn't be taken into consideration at all.

Post by **Hell_is_Silent** » 12 Jun 2006

Spirit wrote:Yeah, I remember seeing that, she reached the top and does some Yoga. Anyone know what that's about, either?

EDIT: Oh, no no, wait. Fuck that theory I just set up one post earlier. Remembered what happened at that scene, never mind!

I'm very glad to hear you revoke that theory.